tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post5460840717083964593..comments2024-03-19T07:10:27.303-07:00Comments on Quark Soup by David Appell: Why the Climategate 2.0 Emails are DevastatingDavid Appellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-54940960629812510582011-12-11T07:11:39.522-08:002011-12-11T07:11:39.522-08:00Scientific projection of global climate change is ...Scientific projection of <i>global</i> climate change is settled, in terms of global mean surface air temperature, given some realistic emission scenarios, with allowance of doubling or halving of the projection, and with assumption that volcanic eruption larger than Tambora will not happen.<br /><br />Scientific projection of <i>regional</i> climate change is not settled. In addition to anthropogenic global warming, perhaps we need to have outlook of internal climate variability such as NAO, PDO etc., and we do not know whether these are predictable at all beyond one cycle. And everyone must adapt to local climate, not with the global average. <br /><br />So, I think, both Hulme and Abraham/Mandia are correct in their respective turf.Kooiti Masudahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15709237727441869109noreply@blogger.com