tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post4874936818342113016..comments2024-03-19T07:10:27.303-07:00Comments on Quark Soup by David Appell: The Excellent Blog, "The Science of Doom"David Appellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-80449979161710523272017-06-11T15:20:11.264-07:002017-06-11T15:20:11.264-07:00Science of Doom is really an excelent blog: very c...Science of Doom is really an excelent blog: very clear and instructive, written for all kind of readers, from dummies to people that like to know the math behind the concepts. And I don't think it's a "denier" - it's just as skeptical as any scientist should be about anything.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04875439094266062071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-84210355039047571992017-06-11T15:07:35.262-07:002017-06-11T15:07:35.262-07:00Is this dude Alexander a denier, a skeptical or a ...Is this dude Alexander a denier, a skeptical or a consensus guy? Anyway, you'd better to ban this moron from your life...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04875439094266062071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-22996411358131709492017-05-24T19:18:02.487-07:002017-05-24T19:18:02.487-07:00Thanks for clearing it up, Layzej. You are correct...Thanks for clearing it up, Layzej. You are correct. I was wrong that I had not banned anyone on the consensus side. Thanks to your data, I found that I had actually banned one person on the consensus side.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-3699429288232732682017-05-24T17:50:52.194-07:002017-05-24T17:50:52.194-07:00You asked, I answered. You're free to ban who...You asked, I answered. You're free to ban whoever you like. It's your blog.Layzejhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11346550512734519728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-9589403154143901972017-05-24T16:00:25.124-07:002017-05-24T16:00:25.124-07:00Layzej,
You are correct. I did ban commenter citi...Layzej,<br /><br />You are correct. I did ban commenter citizenschallenge - for claiming my article was disingenuous. <br /><br />"..Making such a deliberate comparison with The Holocaust is a disingenuous game that climate science contrarians do to further derail our attention away from the real issues we need to look at and learn about.! (or should I say to keep it derailed)."<br /><br />So that's one person banned who is a "consensus type" and about 8 people banned who are confused about the greenhouse effect, radiation and the laws of physics generally and just keep posting comments to demonstrate their confusion and derail threads.<br /><br />We have a blog etiquette at Science of Doom.<br /><br />Clearly I banned citizenschallenge because of his/her consensus position on climate. Along with the 5000 commenters that I haven't banned who have a consensus position on climate. <br /><br />Well, it's always fascinating to see other perspectives.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-28646451044040839392017-05-24T13:45:11.664-07:002017-05-24T13:45:11.664-07:00Hi SoD,
citizenschallenge had someone else post o...Hi SoD,<br /><br />citizenschallenge had someone else post on his behalf towards the end of <a rel="nofollow">this thread</a>. I had assumed this meant he was banned, but maybe not?<br /><br />FWIW, I find your site to be a great resource, though I did find that post comparing science denial with holocaust denial rather crass.Layzejhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11346550512734519728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-14530446277588753722017-05-24T03:15:32.530-07:002017-05-24T03:15:32.530-07:00David, thanks for your kind words.
whut said... &...David, thanks for your kind words.<br /><br />whut said... "<i>That blog isn't actually very useful. The guy that runs it is a denier and will ban consensus types while allowing crackpots to comment. Just my opinion.</i>"<br /><br />Personally, I despise use of the d- word, but let's put that aside.<br /><br />I have banned about 8 people in the entire time of the blog. All of those have been (best case) "confused about the basics" as in "not able to understand the greenhouse effect". I can't think of anyone banned who is "a consensus type".<br /><br />Still, I like evidence. So - please provide this evidence. <br /><br />Who have I banned on the consensus side?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-10758031462559741382017-05-20T19:42:49.265-07:002017-05-20T19:42:49.265-07:00PS: IMOPS: IMODavid Appellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-55247943353389214252017-05-20T19:31:10.131-07:002017-05-20T19:31:10.131-07:00whut: that's ridiculously wrong.whut: that's ridiculously wrong.David Appellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-13793958150386637612017-05-20T17:16:47.518-07:002017-05-20T17:16:47.518-07:00That blog isn't actually very useful. The guy ...That blog isn't actually very useful. The guy that runs it is a denier and will ban consensus types while allowing crackpots to comment. Just my opinion.<br /><br />@whuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18297101284358849575noreply@blogger.com