tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post6957820899323635899..comments2024-03-19T07:10:27.303-07:00Comments on Quark Soup by David Appell: More About Stossel's Set-UpDavid Appellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-6235468246270849932013-04-02T13:16:08.079-07:002013-04-02T13:16:08.079-07:00Roy Spencer's definition of his role as a scie...Roy Spencer's definition of his role as a scientist:<br /><br /><i>“I view my job a little like a legislator, supported by the taxpayer, to protect the interests of the taxpayer and to minimize the role of government.”</i><br /><br />http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/07/06/261843/roy-spencer-job-minimize-the-role-of-government/<br /><br />Between his religious activism and obvious political affiliation, Roy Spencer is possibly teh worst example of a real climate scientist.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08658697422961922139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-66234580472253563872013-04-02T13:03:57.759-07:002013-04-02T13:03:57.759-07:00Les, Spencer is a creationist and a member of the ...Les, Spencer is a creationist and a member of the fringe anti-environmental religious-fundamentalist group Cornwall Alliance. The CA propound the view that God gave us the planet to rape and abuse as we please. Spencer's credentials as a scientist rather than a religious activist are suspect IMHO.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08658697422961922139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-23125023678688203782013-04-02T13:00:54.946-07:002013-04-02T13:00:54.946-07:00Scientist don't debate with deniers for the sa...Scientist don't debate with deniers for the same reason biologists do not debate with creationists - it confers a false respectability, and the deniers always spin it as a "victory". As if sceince work by rhetoric, debating points and votes.<br /><br />I am surprised Schnidt bothered. Of course, Spencer was not asked about his membership of the lobby group Cornwall Alliance.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08658697422961922139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-3205931579050900062013-03-31T15:23:56.113-07:002013-03-31T15:23:56.113-07:00There is some science about this years weather and...There is <a href="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2013/03/melting-ice-and-cold-weather.html" rel="nofollow">some science</a> about this years weather and it is not comfortingEliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-76777581599363988572013-03-31T12:32:50.705-07:002013-03-31T12:32:50.705-07:00nonsense, (like this year's cold weather was c...<i>nonsense, (like this year's cold weather was caused by arctic ice being at 96% of normal, and so was last year's warm weather</i><br /><br />Why, in your opinion, is this "nonsense?"<br /><br />David Appellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-76033887276713844602013-03-30T09:26:00.358-07:002013-03-30T09:26:00.358-07:00anon: recall that in this "debate", both...anon: recall that in this "debate", both participants are scientists.<br /><br />Unless of course, you don't think Spencer is a scientist?Les Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07079072001325437515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-52852627698024083802013-03-30T07:29:34.507-07:002013-03-30T07:29:34.507-07:00The scientists DO stick to the facts. The other s...The scientists DO stick to the facts. The other side (alarmists) tossing out the "Gish Gallup" of nonsense, (like this year's cold weather was caused by arctic ice being at 96% of normal, and so was last year's warm weather) is what gets them into trouble, because they are always corrected by the scientists. The less-than-knowledgeable audience can check the facts. This is the mechanism by which alarmists lose the debate. M D Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18296657642950314473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-83685748341715064372013-03-30T06:57:14.604-07:002013-03-30T06:57:14.604-07:00Scientists are limited by having to stick to the f...Scientists are limited by having to stick to the facts. The other side is not constrained by those niceties. They toss out a Gish Gallup of nonsense and the scientist can only respond to one or two points, thus giving the less-than-knowelgable audience that the scientist could only refute a few of the points.<br />-DanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28837843.post-45033195966123194482013-03-30T06:09:59.768-07:002013-03-30T06:09:59.768-07:00Its not just TV. Its about public debates. And the...Its not just TV. Its about public debates. And there are two axioms on this debate:<br /><br />1. Most AGW proponents flee from any potential debate.<br /><br />2. In the rare instances where they don't, they most often get slaughtered. <br /><br />Point 1 probably flows from point 2 Les Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07079072001325437515noreply@blogger.com