Pages

Monday, November 26, 2007

Bali Carbon Footprint

The IPCC Conference on Climate Change is taking place this Dec 3-14 in Bali, Indonesia.

The conference will have about 12,000 participants from 189 countries, and since Bali is in the middle of nowhere we can assume that the average participant flies 1/4ths of the Earth's circumference to attend, or about 6,000 miles.

Passenger air travel costs 0.18 kg CO2/passenger-mile, for long-distance flights. Of course, many participants will be taking private jets, which will throw this calculation way off.

So the total carbon emissions for travel to-and-from the conference are 26 MMT CO2 (million metric tons).

The average American emitted 24.1 MT CO2 in 2006, so travel to-and-from the Bali conference is equivalent to 1.1 M American-years of carbon expenditure. Or about what the city of Portland, Oregon spends in two years.

Of course, Americans are energy pigs. Worldwide carbon expenditures in 2006 were roughly 20,000 Tg CO2 (=20,000 MMT CO2), for 6.3 B people. So

Bali carbon expenditure = 8.2 M earthling-years

This is just for travel, and does not include travel on private jets, which is likely to be large.

Per-day costs for food, lodging, etc. are assumed here to be the same, as many of these dignitaries no doubt live the high-life, just as they would in a first-class hotel in Bali.

As some people have said, I'll start thinking global warming is a crisis when the people telling me it's a crisis act like it's a crisis. You have to wonder where the Bali participants are coming from.


Note: Correction here.

65 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:23 AM

    How are you getting these numbers? 6000 * 12000 * .18 = 12.96 million kilograms = 12.96 thousand metric tons. You're off by more than three orders of magnitude.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How are you getting these numbers? 6000 * 12000 * .18 = 12.96 million kilograms = 12.96 thousand metric tons. You're off by more than three orders of magnitude.

    Firma
    Oyun

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous5:41 AM

    6000 * 2 * 12000 * 0.18 = 25.92M MT (25.92 million metric tons)

    He failed to mention the implicit assumption of round-trip flight.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous5:45 AM

    Yes, but he's still wrong by (exactly) three orders of magnitude. That's 26 million *kilograms*, not metric tons. One metric ton = 1000 kilograms.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not only is the original post wrong (as already stated) by three orders of magnitude, but the conclusion is obviously false. Consider the things the inhabitants of Portland will do in two years: one of these things is to take far more than 12,000 long-haul commercial flights.

    A top-line retraction is in order.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:30 AM

    > top line retraction

    Only if he thinks there's a crisis, and cares about what's happening.

    If he's here to poke fun and attract attention to himself, he'll leave it up and enjoy the added attention he gets from being wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10:40 AM

    Aside from the fun with bad math, and the ignorance of the fact that Americans frequently travel by air, there's another point here:

    To the extent that this conference leads to changes in carbon release, the changes could easily dwarf the extra amount released by the conference activity itself.

    Sort of like spending money on insulating one's house, to save money on heating/cooling costs. Which, in the mind David Appell, doesn't make sense. But don't feel bad; it doesn't make sense in the U Tenn Law School-honed mind of Instapundit, either.

    -Barry

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous10:55 AM

    I think that Barry has a fair point about the conference leading to some sort of greater good, but isn't there some sort of happy medium here? Have the conference, but figure out the most energy efficient location (i.e. the place that will require the fewest number of long-haul flights), and forgo the private jets. Bali has to be one of the least efficient locations for this... but I'm sure the weather's good, as is the golf. That's where the skepticism comes in. Maybe there's a need to make an investment to get long-term savings, but this particular plan is deeply flawed.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous1:52 PM

    Further to what Barry said, and contra to other commenters on other threads, the Bali conference is not a zero-sum game. Realistically speaking, it won't lead to positive change, but it will help build incremental pressure towards that goal.

    John Paul

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous5:39 AM

    When we assign order of magnitude problems to students we expect them to use reality checks to see if the answer makes sense. Having a conference use more carbon than a large city does for 2 years doesn't make sense, and it's obvious why: Appell couldn't distinguish pounds from tons. This isn't just a cheap shot; it's an innumerate cheap shot and it should have been obvious the moment that it was compared with Portland.

    It's also less than the carbon footprint of, say, a single football bowl game by the same type of calculation; of order 100,000 people travelling 1,500 miles round trip. Correct this embarassment.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous8:27 AM

    All of this "orders of magnitude" doesn't matter. There is no Gullible Warming going on. This is only an attempt to get the US to pay some money. I understand that the total cost of this conference was nearing $48M. If these people really think this is a serious problem, then they should have teleconference the event and really save some carbon. The whole thing is a hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  12. How are you getting these numbers? 6000 * 12000 * .18 = 12.96 million kilograms = 12.96 thousand metric tons. You're off by more than three orders of magnitude.

    Kız Oyunları
    çanakkale
    assos

    ReplyDelete
  13. 6000 * 2 * 12000 * 0.18 = 25.92M MT (25.92 million metric tons)

    He failed to mention the implicit assumption of round-trip flight.

    varmısın yokmusun
    oyun
    oyunlar
    video izle
    firmalar

    ReplyDelete
  14. How are you getting these numbers? 6000 * 12000 * .18 = 12.96 million kilograms = 12.96 thousand metric tons. You're off by more than three orders of magnitude.

    firmalar

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous8:53 AM

    Thanks so much.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous6:05 AM

    its good project thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous2:00 PM

    this is a about, environmnet

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous12:38 AM

    its really nice project.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous2:03 PM

    Thanks for you!! Oyun

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous4:20 PM

    Thanks so much.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous4:57 PM

    great post thanks

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous1:19 AM

    Great .Thanks İbrahim emice

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous1:20 AM

    Thanks a lot ..

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous1:20 AM

    Thanks gülüm.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous8:15 AM

    thank u for this post guys

    Oyun oyna

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous11:43 AM

    Thanks for you!! Oyun

    okey oyna

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous11:45 AM

    Thanks for you!! Oyun

    Bedava Okey

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous11:47 AM

    thank you man oyun sohbet siteleri

    sohbet siteleri
    chatyeli

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous6:56 AM

    thanks for post

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous4:33 AM

    thanks

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous4:59 PM

    Yes, but he's still wrong by (exactly) three orders of magnitude. That's 26 million *kilograms*, not metric tons. One metric ton = 1000 kilograms

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous5:00 PM

    Aside from the fun with bad math, and the ignorance of the fact that Americans frequently travel by air, there's another point here:

    To the extent that this conference leads to changes in carbon release, the changes could easily dwarf the extra amount released by the conference activity itself.

    ReplyDelete
  33. He failed to mention the implicit assumption of round-trip flight.
    Sinema
    Hava durumu

    ReplyDelete
  34. http://www.msntakip.com

    ReplyDelete
  35. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous1:19 AM

    very good... konteyner

    ReplyDelete
  37. http://www.guzelokey.com/okey_42-okey.html

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anonymous12:03 AM

    http://www.filmizlex.com
    http://www.filmvizyon.net
    http://www.sektorekle.com
    http://www.seyir.tv
    http://www.ruyan.org
    http://www.hz-jy.com
    http://www.radyogazete.com
    http://www.radyogazete.net
    http://www.ototrafik.com
    http://www.pierrecassi.net
    http://www.endtube.net
    http://www.roketvideo.com
    http://www.diyetci.org
    http://www.kopma.net
    http://www.olimpiyatevi.com
    http://www.n62.net
    http://www.kurumu.net
    http://www.cikti.net
    http://www.arsivi.net
    http://www.klipizlex.com
    http://www.klipizlex.net
    http://www.klip-tr.com
    http://www.iltur.net
    http://www.adiyamanlilar.com
    http://www.dumludernegi.com
    http://www.kahtalilar.com
    http://www.bizimolsun.com
    http://www.werkgrand.com
    http://www.pierrecassi.com
    http://www.byoral.com
    http://www.guzelokey.com
    http://www.okulgiysisi.com
    http://www.winsgmen.com
    http://www.agiad.biz
    http://www.bizimturk.net
    http://www.oyunu.tk
    http://www.giyim.tk
    http://www.turk.tk
    http://www.gezi.tk
    http://www.bilgi.tk
    http://www.filmkalesi.com
    http://www.guzelokey.com/okey_42-okey.html
    www.guzelkozmetik.com

    ReplyDelete
  39. http://www.filmizlex.com
    http://www.filmvizyon.net
    http://www.sektorekle.com
    http://www.seyir.tv
    http://www.ruyan.org
    http://www.hz-jy.com
    http://www.radyogazete.com
    http://www.radyogazete.net
    http://www.ototrafik.com
    http://www.pierrecassi.net
    http://www.endtube.net
    http://www.roketvideo.com
    http://www.diyetci.org
    http://www.kopma.net
    http://www.olimpiyatevi.com
    http://www.n62.net
    http://www.kurumu.net
    http://www.cikti.net
    http://www.arsivi.net
    http://www.klipizlex.com
    http://www.klipizlex.net
    http://www.klip-tr.com
    http://www.iltur.net
    http://www.antiisrail.net
    http://www.adiyamanlilar.com
    http://www.dumludernegi.com
    http://www.kahtalilar.com
    http://www.bizimolsun.com
    http://www.werkgrand.com
    http://www.pierrecassi.com
    http://www.byoral.com
    http://www.guzelokey.com
    http://www.okulgiysisi.com
    http://www.winsgmen.com
    http://www.agiad.biz
    http://www.bizimturk.net
    http://www.oyunu.tk
    http://www.giyim.tk
    http://www.turk.tk
    http://www.gezi.tk
    http://www.bilgi.tk
    http://www.filmkalesi.com
    http://www.guzelokey.com/okey_42-okey.html
    http://www.guzelkozmetik.com
    http://www.gopslarim.com
    http://www.turhalstyle.com

    ReplyDelete
  40. Thank you but 6000 * 12000 * .18 = 12.96 million kilograms ???

    ReplyDelete
  41. Stephano Muselopolous3:34 AM

    Haha, um...thankyou!
    Stephano the Mortgage Broker

    ReplyDelete
  42. Anonymous5:45 AM

    thanks this new very nice
    okey

    ReplyDelete
  43. 6000 * 2 * 12000 * 0.18 = 25.92M MT (25.92 million metric tons)

    He failed to mention the implicit assumption of round-trip flight.

    ReplyDelete
  44. thank you
    evden eve nakliyat

    ReplyDelete
  45. Thanks you admin.

    very good..

    ReplyDelete
  46. Not only is the original post wrong (as already stated) by three orders of magnitude, but the conclusion is obviously false. Consider the things the inhabitants of Portland will do in two years: one of these things is to take far more than 12,000 long-haul commercial flights.

    ReplyDelete
  47. How are you getting these numbers? 6000 * 12000 * .18 = 12.96 million kilograms = 12.96 thousand metric tons. You're off by more than three orders of magnitude.

    ReplyDelete
  48. 6000 * 12000 * .18 = 12.96 million kilograms = 12.96 thousand metric tons.

    ReplyDelete
  49. He failed to mention the implicit assumption of round-trip flight.

    ReplyDelete