...when will you be posting that list of death threats you took us to task over Appell? SO far you have not responded AFAIK and the offensive condescending holier than thou posts are still up on that little blog of yours. Man up. – AnthonyThese threats and harassments have been widely acknowledged by several scientists and reported on by many journalists (see below). The Guardian, in particular, has seen them and excerpted them. One scientist had a dead animal dumped on their doorstep, according to ABC News. Some of the threats have been reported to the FBI.
These denials are pernicious, obnoxious, and dangerous. They are of a kind, and only a step from being complicit. Commenters here too have played the same game.
It's worse even than the birthers, because denying that the threats exist is itself a kind of threat.
And then, when you point this out to them and give the links below, they censor your comment because it used the word "deny" (not the word "denier," and not used as a label).
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jul/06/hacked-climate-science-emails-sceptics-abuse
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/climate-scientists-receive-death-threats-10729457
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/hacked-climate-emails-death-threats
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t694484/
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7017922.ece
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jul/05/hate-mail-climategate
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/oct/12/democrat-obama-climate-change-agenda
Oh, wow. Shocking, surely unless you know these people. Then it is totally what you would expect from this low-end crew.
ReplyDeleteBest,
D
What does Anthony have to say about this video ?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWVFHJUYVcE
Rule #1: You can never ask too many questions.
ReplyDeleteOf course, Anthony was right all along...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/climate-scientists-claims-of-email-death-threats-go-up-in-smoke/story-e6frgcjx-1226345224816
No surprise that Dano would fall for this rubbish. He believes everything, no matter how ludicrous.
So David.
ReplyDeleteYou were wrong. Time for a public apology, don't you think ?
The alarmists just keep on piling up the BS. Threats from the alarmist crowd are well known. Nuremburg-style trials for 'deniers', Letting their houses burn, etc. The crisis mongers have to make stuff up to get a little sympathy because the facade is crumbling. I eat the air, anticipation crammed!
ReplyDeleteTime for you to grow a conscience and apologise to Anthony Watts!
ReplyDeleteAs a follow up to yesterday’s breaking news that there were never any death threats at all, as determined by a court adjudicate, Simon Turnill writes on Australian Climate Madness that it has been confirmed that there’s a new story in the Australian saying that the police were never contacted over the alleged “death threats”, indicating that the Australian National University didn’t even take the non-existent “death threats” seriously enough to even report it! Today, ANU has “no comment” as to why.
Time to grow a conscience and apologise to Anthony Watts...
ReplyDeleteAs a follow up to yesterday’s breaking news that there were never any death threats at all, as determined by a court adjudicate, Simon Turnill writes on Australian Climate Madness that it has been confirmed that there’s a new story in the Australian saying that the police were never contacted over the alleged “death threats”, indicating that the Australian National University didn’t even take the non-existent “death threats” seriously enough to even report it! Today, ANU has “no comment” as to why.
"These denials are pernicious, obnoxious, and dangerous."
ReplyDeleteAnd also, it appears, true. Oh dear, Mr Appell. Who is now complicit in wrongdoing, in this case utter dishonesty?
Is it time for an honest and honourable retraction?
ReplyDeleteI'll not hold my breath.
For people with nothing to hide, the own goals just keep on piling up.
ReplyDeleteHow about an honest and honorable apology?