A Google News search for the report's title finds five results, none of them the least bit significant. A Google News search for "NIPCC" finds four results, none of them even in English.
No one cares. Everyone knows their game. Maybe even Fred Singer has lied one too many times.
I'd write and call the Institute and authors, and ask what they were paid and where the money came from, but the report is so...inconsequential that it's not even worth it anymore. Clearly, no one cares.
Maybe the world really is learning about all this.
2 comments:
I hope what you say is the case and it's obscure set of lies fade away.
I'd have a look at it, but I've seen one NIPCC report and that was 1 too many :)
While the deniers are still loudly proclaiming that the science is falling apart, I have definitely noticed a trend in the meteorological community that has had one of the higher percentage of doubters.
Those who are skeptical are finding that claiming one of the well known and worn out myths is just not done anymore, and you get weird looks if you do so at an AMS meeting. You still hear comments straight off of WUWT and Heartland pseudoscience but it is increasingly rare.
Post a Comment