Thanks, but I'll probably be back. I do an "I quit" post every time I get depressed, or so. Always came back. I should delete this post but don't want to remove the comments.
Thanks B. I'll get over my latest low and will post more. Not sure it will always be about climate change, though. Things I come across that I like to share.
No worries. And I have an interesting topic that is not science but those guys try to use it against science anyway. The costs of "net zero". Once I saw a statistics about investment in fossils, and it was breathtakingly high like 1T per annum. I foolishly lost the link and internet search is getting worse by the day. I think it was OECD. Anyway, this is interesting and worthy of some research, and a reminder why specifically climate science denial (among other flavors of pseudo-science) is so well funded.
I have always enjoyed reading your 'articles' and observations. Your blog is refreshingly different from others that deal with similar or the same issues. It has a character all of its own that makes it stand out from the dross that others post on the web. Stay safe and well.
For my sake, I hope you do come back! For your sake, I hope you do what is right for you. Either way, thanks for the many years of insights and education!
I have read you for some time, Thanks for writting
ReplyDeleteAh revoir and thank you.
ReplyDeleteThanks, but I'll probably be back. I do an "I quit" post every time I get depressed, or so. Always came back. I should delete this post but don't want to remove the comments.
ReplyDeleteYou came back last time :) I regularly debate climate science deniers and your page is very useful as a resource, even if you post infrequently.
ReplyDeleteThanks B. I'll get over my latest low and will post more. Not sure it will always be about climate change, though. Things I come across that I like to share.
ReplyDeleteNo worries. And I have an interesting topic that is not science but those guys try to use it against science anyway. The costs of "net zero". Once I saw a statistics about investment in fossils, and it was breathtakingly high like 1T per annum. I foolishly lost the link and internet search is getting worse by the day. I think it was OECD. Anyway, this is interesting and worthy of some research, and a reminder why specifically climate science denial (among other flavors of pseudo-science) is so well funded.
DeleteI have always enjoyed reading your 'articles' and observations. Your blog is refreshingly different from others that deal with similar or the same issues. It has a character all of its own that makes it stand out from the dross that others post on the web. Stay safe and well.
ReplyDeleteFor my sake, I hope you do come back! For your sake, I hope you do what is right for you. Either way, thanks for the many years of insights and education!
ReplyDeleteStay please
ReplyDelete