Friday, October 09, 2009

Obama's Nobel Prize

This is a bad choice, bordering on terrible, one that threatens to cheapen the Peace Prize for a good while. What has Obama yet to accomplish? If it's bringing hope, as the Nobel Committee said, then it's the American voter who should get the Prize, for electing him. It's clearly just a political choice, probably intended to insult the Bush administration, and that's never a good reason to give a prize to anyone, especially one that purports to be as serious as this one.

Times of London:
The spectacle of Mr Obama mounting the podium in Oslo to accept a prize that once went to Nelson Mandela, Aung San Suu Kyi and Mother Theresa would be all the more absurd if it follows a White House decision to send up to 40,000 more US troops to Afghanistan.

3 comments:

rhhardin said...

You could argue that Obama's weakened America considerably in many ways, and that's what's agreeable to the prize committee.

cheap said...

He deserve it .... congrats.. peace dude..

limo hire said...

That is not a bad choice...Obama is better rather than Bush..