Thursday, July 03, 2025

Arctic Sea Ice Extent Record Low

The average monthly Arctic sea ice extent for the first half of this year was a record low among all the first halves going back to 1979. Second was 2018, 10,000 km2 higher (0.01 Mkm2). At this pace it will lead to an annual low. 

June's SIE was 3.4% below May's. The average month year-to-date (YTD) has been 3.8% lower than last year's values. If either of those continues for the rest of the year they'd make this year a new annual record by about 0.12-0.14 Mkm2 respectively. Even if the rest of the months of this year are identical to the corresponding months last year, Arctic SIE would tie 2016 for a record low. 

This seems to have snuck up out of nowhere.


(MA in the label box = moving average)

In other numerology, Antarctic SIE in June was 3rd-lowest in the record, and the year-to-date average is 6th. 

UAH's global lower troposphere temperature for June was the 2nd lowest, after last year's. 

The Hadley Central England Temperature (HadCET) was 5th highest going back to 1659. The year-to-date average monthly temperature is also 5th lowest. Its graph is looking pretty dramatic:
   

The South Pole temperature was 21st highest out of 68 years. The year-to-date average is 13th highest of 69 years. As always things are kind of weird down there:

Tuesday, July 01, 2025

Europe's Heat Wave

The heat wave in Europe over the last week:
Note: these aren't temperatures but a metric of "conditions." 

The Eiffel Tower was closed yesterday because of the heat. 42.8°C in Portugal (109°F). Mora, Portugal 46.1°C (115°F) yesterday. (That's like Arizona!)
Working outdoors has also been banned during the hottest parts of the day on building sites, roads, and farms until September, in Lombardy.

In Germany, record-breaking temperatures of 100 degrees Fahrenheit could take place on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Hospital admissions rose by 20% in the Tuscany region in Italy, according to local reports.
Link.

I found this image depicting air conditioning around the world. Only 10% in Europe? Or is that just the UK? 17% in Portugal. 19% in Germany. 40-50% in Italy. 



I couldn't find a systematic list of all countries.

BTW under 5% of building in India have A/C. 

I don't have A/C here in Oregon, which is fine with me, I don't like it at all because of the feeling of being cooped up. I prefer to keep the windows open, which is how I grew up, and I use a fan. I keep track of the daily weather where I live, and in the last 12 years (2012-2024) the average maximum daily temperature here is 39.2°C (102.5°F), occurring on average on July 25th. But the average of the last 5 years is 41.2°C (106.2°F).

I survived the great 2021 heat wave here in the Pacific Northwest, which got up to, where I live, 47.2°C (117°F), and I didn't have A/C. Not any permanent damage as far as I'm concerned, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a little of something. Uncharacteristically, that maximum occurred on June 28th, showing there was something more going on besides just global warming. 

The heat wave was characterized as a heat dome because of the extreme temperatures and the exceptionally strong ridge centered over the area, whose probability of formation was linked to the effects of climate change by multiple studies.
I think I once read it was the 5th worst heat wave in recorded history, but I can't find that now.

Friday, June 27, 2025

Corrupt US Supreme Court Makes an Unbelievable Decision

Every day now America finds itself in a new nightmare, and today's is something you're expect to see in a truly autocratic country: rights guaranteed by the US Constitution are now effectively subject to the whim of the president. Yes, really, that's what the US Supreme Court ruled today. 

In particular, the SCOTUS case was about birthright citizenship--do individuals born on US soil have the right to be a US citizen? The Constitution unequivocally says yes:

Fourteenth Amendment

Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Couldn't be clearer, right?

Not in the eyes of the corrupt US Supreme Court. Today, while not exactly making a decision on this part of the 14th Amendment, they did decide that federal district judges--judges who decide in federal courts all across America--cannot individually decide that a law is unconstitutional or illegal and have that apply to the entire country.

The legality of federal laws can only be decided nationwide by, apparently, the Supreme Court.

This case came up because three federal judges decided that Trump's attempt to end "birthright citizenship" was unconstitutional and ruled his executive order could not go into effect. (Mind you, this was an only an executive order from the President, not even considered by Congress let alone passed, let alone subject to the arduous process for amending the Constitution.) 

Today the Supreme Court decided, 6-3, that federal judges do not have that authority. 
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote the majority opinion, said the judiciary does not have “unbridled authority to enforce” the executive’s obligation to follow the law, because doing so would create an “imperial judiciary.” (NY Times, free link)
Instead they decided that the only way to challenge an executive order is if a state challenges it, or a class action lawsuit is filed in a federal court. 

So a woman, undocumented or not, who has a child on US soil and has the child denied US citizenship--which lots of medieval states in the US are very wont to do--has almost no recourse, especially if she is poor. 

The same presumably goes for all other constitutional rights--due process, free speech, gun rights, separation of church and state, free practice of religion, right to peaceably assemble, protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, right to a speedy trail, the law against slavery, the right to vote, woman's suffrage and more can be denied at the whim of the president, at least temporarily (at most forever).

And look at the monstrosity we have as president. 

To be sure, the SCOTUS didn't explicitly rule on birthright citizenship. Maybe they will take that case up next year, maybe never. But they almost don't have to, because plenty of red (extreme conservative) states will be happy to deny birthright citizenship to brown people. 

In dissent Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote (the full paragraph quoting her is from the NY Times):
Those without resources to sue, Jackson wrote in a separate dissent, are disproportionately “the poor, the uneducated and the unpopular,” and so they will be subject to Trump’s whims. “This is yet another crack in the foundation of the rule of law,” she wrote, “which requires equality and justice in its application.” It creates two zones, she said: one where the rule of law prevails, and one “zone of lawlessness” where “all bets are off.” And that’s anathema to the universality of law that the Constitution’s authors envisioned. 
Already the Supreme Court ruled that the president is subject to immunity for his actions. Now he can do whatever he wants with little-to-no recourse by anyone. Jesus Christ. 

Thursday, June 26, 2025

"Where do climate models go for their apology?"

Climatologist Andrew Dessler on Bluesky:


Lewis's and Curry's predicted values for TCR (1.33°C) and ECS (1.64°C) are spectacularly wrong. 

TCR = Transient Climate Response = global temperature change at the time when CO2 has doubled.
ECS = Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity = global temperature change when the climate has stabilized after CO2 has doubled, viz. after short-term and long-term feedbacks have played out.

We're at CO2 = 430 parts per million, so CO2 is up 54% since its pre-industrial value of 280 ppm. Nowhere close to doubling. Global warming in their year of 2014 was (GISS) 0.75°C and in 2024 was 1.24°C. 2024 was an exceptional year so let's take the average of the five years up through 2024; that's 1.05°C. +0.29°C in just about 7.5 years. 

At that rate their TCR will be attained in another about 7-10 years. That's a very bad prediction. It was just obviously not at all likely. I'm surprised it passed peer review. It could be wrong by a factor of 2 at the rate temperature has increased since 1975 (1.30 C). That's a bit of a cherry pick since for whatever reasons (clean air regulations on cars? higher emissions?) temperature took off around 1975
 

I think it's hard to grasp how massive a 0.20-0.25°C/decade increase is. It's starting to seem normal in a sense, but it's anything but. 

Former Fetus

Friday, June 20, 2025

Look, Another Healthy Country!

The Austrian government on Wednesday proposed a bundle of new laws on private gun ownership, eight days after the deadliest school shooting in the country’s history.

The measures include raising the minimum age to own some firearms, including handguns, to 25 from 21, strengthening the mandatory psychological test that must be passed to buy a gun and instituting a four-week waiting period between the purchase and the delivery of a first weapon.

- The New York Times, yesterday (free link)
Here in the US not enough Americans care enough about little kids being murdered by big guns to do anything of the sort. It's often said that that was clearly the country's decision after the Sandy Hook school shooting of 2012, killed by a crazy 20-year old who killed 26 people, mostly six- and seven-year olds, and six teachers. (Not sure if that includes his mother, who he shot and killed before leaving for the school.) 

The country simply shrugged its shoulders and said, "there's just no way to stop this."
 
There is one particular image about that event I can't get out of my head. About a dozen students and one (I think) teacher went into a closet to hide. It was 3 ft by 4 ft. The shooter came and opened the door and rapidly fired with one of his five guns. Into the closet, packed full of people. One child survived, somehow. Can you imagine. Can you even imagine being the police official who found this scene. Can you imagine being the child who survived. Can you imagine the parents who have to think about this every day since.
 
Last year there were 39 school shootings in the US that injured or killed someone. Yet not one new law on gun restrictions, as far as I know. We just have to put up with it. My sister had to run out of a store at the mall when a shooting began. I've personally had a neighbor point a rifle at me. (I called the police and he was arrested, lost his & his wife's apartment, but I was never able to ascertain if he had been convicted of anything.) 

We're just supposed to live with it. This is a very sick country. 

Saturday, June 14, 2025

New Record for Ocean Heat Content

Ocean heat content reached a record high in the first quarter of this year:



data: 0-700 m, 0-2000 m

The quarterly changes were mostly negative for the three quarters before this one, but this time increased by large amounts: 3.1 W/m2 for the 0-700 m region and 3.0 W/m2 for the 0-2000 m region.

Over four quarters the increases were 0.2 W/m2 and 07 W/m2, respectively.

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

1.5°C by 2035

Note 6/10 2:20 pm: Oops, this is the graph is for Mays. I've put the graph for all months down at the bottom. Sorry.

Here's a graph Berkeley Earth presented today:


The trend, a 30-year LOESS smooth regression (the thin red line), is a little over 1.3°C right now. Their trend is 0.20°C/decade, perhaps (paper coming out next month) 0.25°C/decade. 

That means the trend line will hit 1.5°C in about a decade. The 2023-2024 warming spike will then appear relatively cool from that perspective.

0.25°C/decade is a monstrous value. (Even 0.20°C/decade is.) It's hard to get one's head around it, it's such a rapid increase. It's changing the future incredibly fast. It's like the last ice age global maximum went to the Holocene in only 240 years, instead of the actual 12,000 years it actually took. Warming now is 50 times faster. 

It's just worthless now to talk about limiting warming to 1.5°C. It will not happen, hard stop. At that point 2.0°C will be here by 2055-2060, looking also a done deal. It's tragic, and absolute failure of world leadership. The worst failure in human history.

Extremely discouraging. 

==

Added, as noted at the beginning of the post: Average global temperatures for all months:



Americans to Pay More to Cause Even More Climate Change

I don't even know what to call this--a reverse carbon tax?--but it's laughable and incredibly stupid. (But what isn't from Trump?) From the NY Times (free link): 

A 63-year-old coal-fired power plant was scheduled to permanently close its doors in Michigan on June 1. So was an oil- and gas-powered plant that was built in the 1960s in Pennsylvania.

But at the last minute, the Trump administration ordered both to stay open. The orders came as it pursues a far-reaching plan to boost fossil fuels, including coal, by declaring a national “energy emergency.”

The grid operators in Michigan and Pennsylvania said they hadn’t asked for the orders and hadn’t planned on using the plants this summer.

The costs to keep the plants open, which could total tens of millions of dollars, are expected to fall on consumers. Experts have said there’s little evidence of a national energy emergency, and 15 states have sued to challenge President Trump’s declaration, which was issued the day he took office.
Of course there is no "energy emergency" in the US. (Trump is declaring emergencies everywhere, like with immigration, so he can use special powers given to the President is such situations.) It produces more oil than it consumes, oil exports are growing and there is certainly no shortage of natural gas.

But Trump hates clean energy, because he's stuck in a 1970s mentality and maybe because he couldn't stop a wind turbine being installed in view of his golf course in Scotland. 

And he did ask the fossil fuel industry for a billion dollars for his last campaign. Presumably this is the quid of that quid pro quo.

America is already one of the largest CO2 emitters per capita, but apparently that's not good enough, Americans will have to pay more to emit more and cause more climate change. 

It's really shocking how fast the US is declining.

2nd-warmest May Globally

Both Copernicus and Berkeley Earth reported today that May 2025 was the 2nd warmest May -- in BE's case, since 1850.

BE had a Monthly Press Briefing Zoom call this morning with more details:

  • May 2025 was 1.33 C above the 1850-1900 average
    • that's 0.15 C below April 2025 and the first month in 12 months below 1.5 C
    • 2nd warmest Spring (Mar-May)
    • 2nd warmest spring (March-May)
    • 5th warmest May for land temperatures
    • Third warmest May for ocean temps
      • notable: the marine heat wave around UK, probably due to short-term meteorological conditions
      • 4% of the Earth’s surface had a locally record warm May average
        • 1% of land surfaces and 5% of ocean surfaces
      • India cool in May; record high rainfall
      • A city in central India had coolest May in 100 yrs
      • Land only anomaly – +1.62 C above 1850-1900 avg
      • Ocean third warmest for May, +0.99 C
      • Probabilities for 2025:
        • 5% chance 2025 could be the warmest yar
        • 50% chance 2025 is 2nd warmest year on record
        • 43% chance to be above 1.5 C
      • Long-term trend presently reads 1.4 C, rising at 0.2 C/decade.
      • 2023/2024 warming spike likely to be the average year a decade from now
      • Paper coming out next month: rate of rise has increased to 0.25 C/decade
      • Likely due to declining aerosols

Monday, June 02, 2025

HadCET: Warmest Meteorological Spring

Meteorological spring is March to May. (*In the Northern Hemisphere.)

The Hadley Central England Temperature (HadCET) just had the warmest meteorological spring in its 367-year history.

(OK, it's really only 303 years, because some of those early years had temperatures taken inside buildings, etc., not in a systematic fashion, but can you really blame them for trying?)

But still, 303 years. That's pretty impressive.

And this year's March-April-May average saw the warmest temperature anomaly in that little region, 2.26°C, which was the same as last year's value, exactly.

Baseline is 1901-2000.

Still, this year's year-to-date average only ranks 11th highest in all those years.

But things are cooking.

The 10-year moving average for HadCET is at a maximum, 0.52°C higher than 10 years (120 months) ago.

The 50-year linear trend is an impressive 0.31°C/decade.

But it's just a little region in England.

Some Retractions and Clarifications

So I wrote a few things the other day that were pretty dumb and which I don't really think. 

What can I say? I was having a bad day. A very bad day. It happens, more than I'd like. I've been dealing with bad days (and bad weeks and bad months) since I was 17 years old. Depression is an illness and one of the worst illnesses, I think. I've often wished I had cancer instead, because then you get to die from the disease and it's over, or you are (usually) cured and get over it and move on. Not always, I know. 

Psychiatrists and doctors and therapists like to say depression is curable, like a doctor I recently read in the NY Times. But I've never found that cure. There is such a thing as treatment-resistant depression. Or maybe, perhaps, and I'm not kidding, I'm just a weak person. It's a real possibility. In any case, nothing else has had such a large impact on my being in the last 50 years. 


...but I'm also not that interested in climate change anymore. I was only ever interested in the science, not the politics, but as the science seems more and more established it's falling out of my Overton Window. I'm not interested in every nuance of the AMOC ocean stream and polar ice and carbon capture, and certainly not whether the world will seriously address the problem.

It's true that the US politics are a mess, and I don't want to write about every stupid thing Trump says or all the other deniers who, to me, seem less relevant every year. Of course, since Trump is cutting science in about every way possible, including climate science and meteorology, deniers like Anthony Watts probably think they are winning, or have won. 

But that just speaks to their ideological focus and lack of scientific understanding. It's always been clear that Watts knows little science and was more interested in traffic and money than in publishing the truth.... Of course, no professional scientist or expert thinks climate change is done, and no sane person would believe the usual denier suspects than the professionals. They will have to answer to someone, someday, though surely are too arrogant and full of themselves to do so honestly.

We have a lot of climate change still ahead of us, probably enough to get us to at least 3°C. 

One-half of an ice ages' worth of warming. My God.

While I might not be interested in every up and down of the AMOC's decline, I know the trends and they are extremely worrisome. Few people outside the climate community and smart readers (like you) understand this.


I hope he [Trump] brings about the collapse of the US as soon as possible--it's been coming on for 50 years, and America certainly deserves it--so US regions can secede and start again. But I don't care about that either--I'm not married, I don't have any kids, so I don't have any stake in the future.

Well, to be honest, I do hope the US collapses soon. It surely won't be pleasant, but it is necessary, I believe--not just for Americans, but for the entire world. The US is now 1/3rd of a billion people, too big to form a true democracy, even a democratic republic. Our representatives don't give a shit what their constituents think, there are simply too many of them. I've read that they all spend a significant fraction of their time simply on the phone calling past donors for more donations. I don't doubt it. Citizen's United, and all that, set the ultimate destruction of the US in place. Yet I don't think it was incorrectly decided. This was a fundamental flaw in the Constitution (speech=money), which I don't see any way out of. If newspapers get free speech, why doesn't anyone else get it in a similar fashion?

The US needs to break up to return government closer to the people. 

Trump -- probably the devil incarnate (if I believed in supernatural beings like the devil) -- isn't fixing anything, and only accelerating our downfall.

Yes, I'm not married, never will be, don't have any children and never will. I have a niece and nephew whom I love, but they are pretty intelligent and come from a great home and have (and will have more) a ton of advantages. They'll get by, even if maybe they need to leave the US to do it. But what am I to do? I can hope the future is amenable to them, but there's nothing I can do to make it so, besides loving them. But now that they're no longer children, they need me less, and frankly not at all anymore.... 

None of us can do anything else for them. That's the huge tragedy of all this. It's long since been out of our hands. And, what did we really do wrong? 

Again, the country (and the world) is too big.

More and more it seems futile to me to hope for a better future when there's nothing I can do to make it so. Not really. And I'm getting old and tired and sore and am all stoved up and just don't have the energy I used to. Not that my energy has ever done any good anyway. I really don't see that I've accomplished anything in my life. I didn't even pass my genes on--intelligent genes, even though they carry depression.

This is what I felt I needed to say about that post, now over a week old. It's embarrassing, and I hope you will forgive me.

Cheers.

Excellent Anthropology YouTube Channel: @stefanmilo

I recently discovered a great YouTube channel called @stefanmilo about issues in anthropology, and I've been watching its back issues. It's by Stefan Milosavljevich, who, it turns out, lives in Portland, Oregon, just an hour north of me. He's interesting, he's a very good video producer, level-headed and enticingly curious, has a global perspective, and he asks real scientists for interviews. He writes:
"To ensure I'm not spewing bollocks into the void I follow these golden rules: 

  • Use only academic sources for my videos
  • Share those sources with the viewers
  • Make it obvious when I'm just giving my personal opinion

  • No Atlantis, No Aliens, No Nonsense."
    It's very engaging and has really open my eyes to world of anthropology (in a way a 6-9 pm college course never did) and the modern issues within it. One of the best channels I've found in awhile.

    Friday, May 30, 2025

    from E B White

    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority."

    E. B. White
    from the 2016 book The Myth of Human Supremacy by Derrick Jensen, which I'm reading now and gives a lot to think about.

    E.B. White was a prominent US writer last century who wrote a great deal for The New Yorker magazine, and who wrote, among many other things, the famous children's book Charlotte's Web.

    Saturday, May 24, 2025

    USA Wildfires


    Data: National Interagency Fire Center

    --

    Not sure how much I'm going to blog anymore. I have a really bad neck, with four fusions, since 2010, and it's gotten a lot worse this year as I try to sit at a computer for more than an hour or two. I'm not even doing enough work to earn a living. At this point even opiates don't help alot, and the more I work the worse it gets. And I just get tired. But I'll never be able to retire here, so unless I move to another country I'm going to have to be miserly about spending time typing unless it's for pay. I'll drop in every now and again to post something I find interesting, about science or literature or something else, but I'm also not that interested in climate change anymore. I was only ever interested in the science, not the politics, but as the science seems more and more established it's falling out of my Overton Window. I'm not interested in every nuance of the AMOC ocean stream and polar ice and carbon capture, and certainly not whether the world will seriously address the problem [added 5/30: I retract that; I was having a bad day.] (which they haven't yet in 30 years, despite Kyoto and Paris, aided by immoral, even evil bloggers like Watts and Steve what's-his-name and Chuck W and that guy in Montana whose name I'm not interested enough to remember.) Ed-something, I think. (He's full of shit anyway.) They are all completely wrong, of course, but all too shameless and arrogant to ever admit it. And, the corporations have won, putting endless profits over the survival of society. Republicans have won, even though they're destroying the country & the world. And I certainly don't want to write about Trump, the devil incarnate--I hope he brings about the collapse of the US as soon as possible--it's been coming on for 50 years, and America certainly deserves it--so US regions can secede and start again. But I don't care about that either--I'm not married, I don't have any kids, so I don't have any stake in the future. [added 5/30: I retract this too. It wasn't the best day for me to be blogging.] And lately I really feel that. My fault for not establishing stakes, a major failure, but it's too late now. I'm mostly here to see my 15-year old cat's life through to its end. I'd just rather do whatever paying work I can in the hours I have then read novels the rest of the time and watch hockey when it's in season.

    Sunday, May 18, 2025

    Bizarro Arctic Sea Ice

    Arctic Sea Ice is acting weird. Here's the volume as modeled by PIOMAS. {Really this is just an excuse for me to try datawrapper.de, because Excel charts have never looked good and by now look like something from the late 1900s.} But it is strange how the SIV has been basically flat for the last 15 years. (Arctic sea ice extent is just as unusual.) 


    Here is a conference presentation screen capture I captured from the leading PIOMAS modeler in Sept 2014:

    I think this was from a Cliff Maas blog post or comment I read in 2017, but can't find it exactly. The screen capture looks like it's from a conference. 

    Anyway it's very wrong. Actually the decline, linearly regressed, is about 1/1.5, now 1/6.  

    Lesson?: beware of making climate predictions unless it's about mean global surface temperature, and even then ENSOs mess you up.

    --

    So why is there a "pause" in Arctic melting? This paper on ESS Open Archive (?) goes into it. It's not peer reviewed, which is unfortunate. Given that, here's the abstract:


    So it's maybe worse, going back 20 years (to 2005). Could last 5-10 more years. (Not convenient, given my lifespan.) 

    So, internal variability, which is nearly impossible to explain to deniers.

    Tuesday, May 13, 2025

    Conquering the Universe

    "Just because some of us can read and write and do a little math, that doesn't mean we deserve to conquer the Universe."

    Kurt Vonnegut

    Saturday, May 10, 2025

    CO2 > 430 ppm

    Atmospheric carbon dioxide has cracked the 430 ppm level at the Mauna Loa Observatory in on Hawaii. 


    Here's NOAA's daily source for the data; the image above is from Daily CO2.

    In fact, atmospheric CO2 at MLO peaked this year at 431.13 ppm on 27-April-2025. Last year it peaked at 428.59 ppm on 26-April-2024. That's only a 2.45 ppm increase, maybe a touch below the recent average, maybe due to the relative ENSO states. 2024 as a year (not a season) was somewhat on the La Nina-side, with this year slightly towards the El Nino-side. (I think.)


    So, it's not clear if next year will break 435 ppm. Anyway the fascists might have stopped all US scientific measurements by then. (Yes, I know it's measured at many other places around the globe, but as far as I know none of them has the longevity of the Mauna Loa data.)

    Thursday, May 08, 2025

    Suppressing the Costs of Climate Change

    The fascists have decided to stop keeping track of the costs of climate change. Free link to NY Times story.

    If you don't keep track of it, it's like it doesn't exist. This is hard for me to wrap my head around at the moment.



    Tuesday, May 06, 2025

    50 Years at 0.30°C/decade

    The 50-year linear trend for the Hadley Central England Temperature (HadCET) is a very healthy worrisome 0.30°C/decade.


    Without including any autocorrelation, because I don't feel like calculating it today, the 2-sigma uncertainty is 0.07°C/decade.

    Over 50 years that's an increase of 1.52°C (2.73°F).

    Also, the 10-year moving average reached a record high in April at 10.7°C. (That's an absolute number, not an anomaly.) 


    HadCET is measured over a fairly broad area of...central England...bounded by an approximate triangle from Lancaster in the north of England to Bristol in the southwest to London in the southeast. Former homes of such famous people as Gollum (well, actor Andy Serkis), Blackbeard the Pirate and Charles the Darwin, son of Robert, a wealthy society doctor and financier, and grandson of Erasmus the Darwin, a (inhale) "natural philosopher, physiologist, slave-trade abolitionist, inventor, freemason, and poet" (exhale). 

    Via Wikipedia.

    Caught Only Half the Time

    Meowthematics >> Mathematics
    byu/Ok-Cap6895 inmathmemes

    Monday, April 28, 2025

    The Dispossessed

    “If you can see a thing whole,” he said, “it seems that it’s always beautiful. Planets, lives…But close up, a world’s all dirt and rocks. And day to day, life’s a hard job, you get tired, you lose the pattern. You need distance, interval. The way to see how beautiful the earth is, is to see it as the moon. The way to see how beautiful life is, is from the vantage point of death.”


    Ursula K. Le Guin, The Dispossessed

    A really great book.

    Saturday, April 26, 2025

    Latest SST

    If you need an update on the latest sea surface temperatures, this is from Zack Labe on Bluesky:

    Wednesday, April 23, 2025

    2024: Record high CO2 energy emissions

    2024 global energy-related CO2 emissions were a record high, at 37.8 Gt, according to the International Energy Administration (IEA). That's an annual increase of 1.0%.
    In 2024, CO2 emissions from fuel combustion grew by around 1% or 357 Mt CO2, while emissions from industrial processes declined by 2.3% or 62 Mt CO2. Emissions growth was lower than global GDP growth (+3.2%), restoring the decades-long trend of decoupling emissions growth from economic growth, which had been disrupted in 2021.
    Natural gas emissions rose by around 2.5% (180 Mt CO₂) in 2024, making it the largest contributor to global carbon emissions growth. This increase was driven by higher consumption in China, the United States, the Middle East, and India.
    This is disappointing:
    Global coal emissions rose by 0.9% (135 Mt CO₂) in 2024. The increase was primarily fuelled by growing coal consumption in China, India and Southeast Asia, while demand declined in advanced economies, particularly in the United States and the European Union.
     

    Saturday, April 19, 2025

    Climate Sensitivity from Paleoclimate Data

    Here's a graph from Skinner 2012 that I've never seen before and I'm surprised I've never seen it before--the climate sensitivity from many climate events, warming and cooling, in the distant past:


    This is from 
    "A Long View on Climate Sensitivity," Luke Skinner
    Science 24 Aug 2012, Vol. 337, Issue 6097, pp. 917-919

    (paywalled). The individual climate sensitivities--the amount of global warming that may be expected as a result of a doubling of the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration--vary, in part because every climate event starts in a different climate and so won't trace the same warming path as any other. Still there's apparently not a lot of variation between events. 

    The author gives 12 pairs of data for the different in supplementary material (also paywalled). From it I get a best linear fit to this graph of 

    ΔT/ΔF = 0.704°C/(W/m2)

    which, using the definition of climate sensitivity λ 

    gives, for a doubling of temperature


    where α is this proportionality constant equal to 5.35 W/m2. Plugging in the numbers


    and that quite enough LaTeX for one day. (Like all physics graduate students, I used to be a wiz in LaTeX back then.)

    The IPCC 6AR gives a climate sensitivity of 2.5 - 4.0°C, so there is some agreement.

    Thursday, April 17, 2025

    When the Ice Leaves the Port

    Lake Winnipesaukee is the largest lake in New Hampshire, US, at 185 km2 (71.4 mi2) (8.4 mi)2. I still find it interesting because for about 6 years I lived high above it and close in a cozy mother-in-law apartment, with a screened porch, and the Lake spread out before me like...well, like a big lake. At least a good part of it. 

    Consequently, I can still spell "Winnipesaukee." 

    From CoPilot:

    The name "Winnipesaukee" is derived from the Algonquian language and translates to "The Smile of the Great Spirit" or "Beautiful Water in a High Place".

    The Lake freezes over in the winter, and people go out ice-fishing, etc. There's an airport runway on the ice over in Alton on the east end of the Lake--"the only FAA-certified, plowed ice runway in the continental United States." It doesn't (viz. can't) open every year, but it did open this year. Global warming is affecting the Lake.

    A popular metric in that region is the Lake's "ice-out" date.

    Ice-Out is declared when the cruise ship MS Mount Washington can make it to every one of its ports: Center Harbor, Wolfeboro, Alton, Weirs Beach and Meredith. It is also considered the unofficial start to the boating season as well as the end of winter in New Hampshire.

    These day a local pilot flies over the Lake multiple times a day this time of year to declare Ice-Out. I wrote about him for Yale Climate Connections several years ago.

    There is also an "ice-in" date, but it's not as popular because it means the start of a long, cold, dark winter and nobody gets too hyped for that. (In truth winter there sets in long before ice-in, which usually is announced in January or early February.) But ice-out is a ritual of spring, and soon your cabin fever will break. About mid-May, if you can just hang on.

    Anyway...and please pardon me if I've written about all this before somewhere on this blog...this year's Ice-out was declared this morning at 7:02 am. (Seems suspiciously exact, but anyway.) The time series of Ice-Out dates is carried by Wikipedia. I had to look up the time in the local news, and I only have times since 2020. For earlier years there is ice-out data, but no time, so I took it as noon.

    Here's the time-series of ice-out dates on Winnipesaukee since 1887. The red line is the 30-year moving average.


    So the 30-year moving average has decreased about 10 days since 1917, that is, ice-out arrives earlier. The linear trend is about -0.75 days/decade, but of course the R2 is small, just 0.28. That's -7.5 days/century. A week per century. 

    The data are a pretty decent proxy for global temperature. I should make a histogram. Soon. Maybe. 

    BTW, there was a year without an ice-out date--2001, when I was living there--because there never was an ice-in--the Lake didn't freeze over that year. This was before smartphones so I don't have pictures of it. I did take a lousy picture with a digital camera, but can't find it now. Any more it's kind of like life started only when smartphones became ubiquitous.

    Ice fisherman lost some trucks.

    Addendum: Once up there I saw a section of the lake surface freeze over in real time--a rolling edge of freezing, maybe traveling over a half-mile. Maybe a mile. Took about 10-15 seconds. I wasn't sure if I really saw that or not--I thought I did, but it seemed impossible--so I contacted a few limnologists--scientists who study lakes--and more than one told me they'd heard of such a phenomenon, but had never seen it, and called me lucky or fortunate or some such word.

    So, spring is coming even to New England. There's hope. Here in Oregon it's getting into the 70s. (Fahrenheit. About 20 degrees Celsius.)

    Have a nice day.

    Wednesday, April 16, 2025

    A1, Artificial One

    Andreas Schleicher, the head of education and skills at the O.E.C.D., told The Financial Times, “Thirty percent of Americans read at a level that you would expect from a 10-year-old child.” He continued, “It is actually hard to imagine — that every third person you meet on the street has difficulties reading even simple things.”
     *

    Why? The US Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, who with her husband and business partner Vince McMahon founded the clownish WWE, World Wrestling Entertainment recently pronounced "AI" (as in artificial intelligence) as "A1"--"A One." No kidding. That's the kind of inspiring leadership this country has now. Unfortunately, her job working for Trump is to dismantle [of course] the Department of Education because 30 percent is apparently too low. Trump said when campaigning the Department is filled with "radicals, zealots and Marxists," which are apparently new synonyms for "teacher." 

    Actually what the Department mostly does is distribute money and administer the student loan program, which Trump doesn't like either because too many push “critical race theory, transgender insanity, and other inappropriate racial, sexual or political content” and he wants to (AP) "reward states and schools that end teacher tenure and enact universal school choice programs." In short, they want that money for private schools, religious and otherwise, and to keep the poor poor in subpar public schools. Remember, Trump "likes the poorly educated." Yes, he actually said that while campaigning.

    I wish this was just a crazy stupid made-up story, but it's all true. No, it makes no sense for us either. The Trump administration is increasingly looking like clowns running amuck in a shooting gallery. Except the gallery is the entirety of the United States of America.

    *

    Costa Rica, Portugal, Greece, the Philippines, Romania, Mexico. Where to go? 

     *

    Check out this brutal putdown of the US by a Chinese official. "We expect to survive for another 5,000 years." 


    Sign from a recent protest rally:



    NOAA, Is This Really Necessary???


    Sheesh.

    Monday, April 14, 2025

    Musk Popularity

    At least Elon Musk's popularity (in the US) is tanking. Or at least declining:
     

    Imagine the richest person in the world getting to decide who gets to work in the federal government and how many benefits Americans receive. It sounds like something from a bad Ayn Rand novel. (As if all of them weren't bad.)

    Fortunately Tesla sales in Europe are tanking even more. Here's even more bad news. Even cabinet members in the Trump regime are getting sick of him: 
    Gizmodo: "Elon Musk Is Annoying, Unfunny, and Should Probably Take a Drug Test, Trump Officials Reportedly Say: A senior official describes the billionaire as an awkward and obnoxious asshole."
    I mean, Musk's idea of being funny (or something) is throw up Nazi salutes. He should be drummed out of any public life for that alone. Somehow that no longer happens in today's America. I can't come close to explaining it.

    Saturday, April 12, 2025

    from "The Dispossessed"

    “Suffering is a misunderstanding,” Shevek said, leaning forward, his eyes wide and light. He was still lanky, with big hands, protruding ears, and angular joints, but in the perfect health and strength of eariy manhood he was very beautiful. His dun-colored hair, like the others', was fine and straight, worn at its full length and kept off the forehead with a band. Only one of them wore her hair differently, a girl with high cheekbones and a flat nose; she had cut her dark hair to a shiny cap all round. She was watching Shevek with a steady, serious gaze. Her lips were greasy from eating fried cakes, and there was a crumb on her chin.

    “It exists,” Shevek said, spreading out his hands. “It's real. I can call it a misunderstanding, but I can't pretend that it doesn't exist, or will ever cease to exist. Suffering is the condition on which we live. And when it comes, you know it You know it as the truth. Of course it's right to cure diseases, to prevent hunger and injustice, as the social organism does. But no society can change the nature of existence. We can't prevent suffering. This pain and that pain, yes, but not Pain. A society can only relieve social suffering, unnecessary suffering. The rest remains. The root, the reality. All of us here are going to know grief; if we live fifty years, we'll have known pain for fifty years. And in the end we'll die. That's the condition we're born on. I'm afraid of life! There are times I — I am very frightened. Any happiness seems trivial. And yet, I wonder if it isn't all a misunderstanding — this grasping after happiness, this fear of pain . . . .  If instead of fearing it and running from it, one could . . . get through it, go beyond it. There is something beyond it. It's the self that suffers, and there's a place where the self — ceases. I don’t know how to say it. But I believe that the reality — the truth that I recognize in suffering as I don't in comfort and happiness — that the reality of pain is not pain. If you can get through it. If you can endure it all the way.'"

    “'The reality of our life is in love, in solidarity,' said a tall, soft-eyed girl. 'Love is the true condition of human life.'

    “Bedap shook his head. ‘No. Shev's right,’ he said. ‘Love's just one of the ways through, and it can go wrong, and miss. Pain never misses. But therefore we don't have much choice about enduring it! We will whether we want to or not.”

    -- The Dispossessed, Ursula K. Le Guin

    Saturday, April 05, 2025

    "Henry Fonda for President"

    Movie trailer, from an Australian director who posits that actor Henry Fonda was the embodiment of America itself. 

    "Caged and fighting the bars but timid of the light."
     

    Sunday, March 30, 2025

    Myanmar Earthquake Waves Traveling Through Europe

    Very cool:

    Sick Goal

    Pardon me, I try to avoid blogging about hockey, but this is an amazing goal by Brian Rust of the [my] Pittsburgh Penguins.
     

    Notice how Sidney Crosby--number 87 and one of the best hockey players in the visible universe--first whacks down a pass to him that was above the ice, controls the puck, then passes the puck while lifting it over the stick/blade of the guy defending him. Then Rust (#17) stretches and hits the puck after a bounce over the goalie. I've never seen a goal like this.
     
    The Penguins, legendary in the '00s and '10s, have really lost it and are now ranked #28 in the league (of 32 teams). They will miss the playoffs for the third straight year. But it's worth watching because every game Crosby does something you've never seen before.

    Last game Crosby set a record of 20 seasons scoring one point a game or better. (A point is a goal or an assist.) He beat out Wayne Gretzky, who had 19. Incredible consistency, since he joined the league at 18 years old. In fact, he's never had an NHL season where he's scored less than one point per game.

    Friday, March 28, 2025

    New Record Low for Arctic Sea Ice

    The NSIDC says that Arctic sea ice just set a record for the lowest annual maximum. This is from their press release. I've abbreviated some of the units, which they choose to write out in their long-form, and made everything metric (because around here we don't dabble in the black arts):
    On March 22, Arctic sea ice likely reached its maximum extent for the year, at 14.33 Mkm2..., the lowest in the 47-year satellite record. This year’s maximum extent is 1.31 Mkm2...below the 1981 to 2010 average maximum of 15.64 Mkm2...and 80,000 km2...below the previous lowest maximum that occurred on March 7, 2017.


    But this is meaningless in the US now, because climate change doesn't officially exist. (They know it does, but practice fake denialism.) Trump recently said he thinks science don't know what's causing climate change.... NSIDC gets plenty of US federal government funding, so perhaps they won't exist for next year's annual maximum (not kidding), and maybe even the satellites will be turned off (also not kidding). After all, that's money that should properly be going to (more) tax cuts for billionaires (still not kidding). You don't know what you can't measure, and President Krasnov clearly doesn't want us to know.

    Great Image of Venus


    from "The COSPAR planetary protection requirements for space missions to Venus," María Paz Zorzano et al, Life Sciences in Space Research, Volume 37, May 2023, Pages 18-24.

    note: orange represents a data gap. 

    Tuesday, March 18, 2025

    Is Ocean Heat Content Really Accelerating?

    An article in the NY Times (free link) reports on a World Meteorological Organization report that says the 10 warmest years in the surface temperature records are the last 10 years. That's very bad. 

    One sentence in the article especially caught my eye. 
    This warmth is especially apparent in the oceans, where key indicators of climate change are now accelerating.
    They don't say which indicators, but I assume ocean heat content (OHC) is a prominent one. 

    I used to think, based on the data, that it was indeed accelerating. But from my amateurish calculations, it looks like the OHC in the 0-2000 meter range (top half) has stopped accelerating. It had a peak in the first quarter of last year, and the last three readings are below that. OK, ENSOs and whatnot. A very recent peak isn't important or interesting.

    Here are the data:


    The leading coefficient of the second-degree polynomial is now 0.037 ZJ/yr2 (ZJ=zetajoules=1021 joules). But it has a 2-sigma uncertainty of 0.044 ZJ/yr2, calculated by the standard linear regression (with no autocorrelation, which would only make the error bars higher (I think)).

    The 0-2000 m acceleration is twice this coefficient, and in more typical units is 0.0046 ± 0.0055 (W/m2)/yr. So it's not statistically significant at the 2-sigma level.  

    The 0-700 m acceleration is statistically significant at 0.0088 ± 0.0004 (W/m2)/yr.

    I don't have data on the lower half of the ocean. I don't even know if it exists, though I have seen a few papers years ago that it's warming, though at a much slower rate. (Now I can't find them.)

    Don't know if this means anything--the ocean heat is still increasing strongly, of course. I could calculate that, but I'm not going to right now because I'm tired. Maybe tomorrow. Likely the recent OHCs are messed up wonky because of the big El Nino than the small La Nina. 

    Just wanted to put up my the little calculations, to justify the time it took to build the spreadsheet. (Really, I just like making spreadsheets & keeping track of the basic climate data).

    Cheers.

    Saturday, March 15, 2025

    Early Blogger Kevin Drum Has Died

    The blogger Kevin Drum has died. He was one of the first bloggers I ever read regularly, way back in the early-to-mid aughts. The NY Times has an obituary (free link), and there was a last post on his latest blog.

    Saturday, March 08, 2025

    Roy Spencer's Comical, Sad, Desperate Arguments

    Roy Spencer continues to make some very sad, desperate arguments in the name of climate denial. Arguments are that beneath him as a professional scientist. Arguments that show why he has no respect at all in the climate science community. 

    In a recent post he wrote:

    "The regulation of CO2 emissions (and some other chemicals) by the EPA has also mystified me. However many of the EPA’s ~185 lawyers worked on the 2009 Endangerment Finding, they must have known that regulating CO2 emissions from U.S. cars and light-duty trucks would have no measurable impact on global climate, including sea level rise (which was a major argument in Massachusetts v. EPA).

    None."

    Of course, by this argument no one should do ever do anything about CO2 emissions because, individually, all regulations are "too small" to solve the global problem.

    But the sum over many small quantities can certainly be a big quantity.  

    It's an intentionally deceitful argument that convinces no one except the hare-brained commenters on his site. And Roy knows enough to know this. Sad. It's a dumb argument and I'm wondering why he made it. This is exactly why people don't trust Roy or his "science."

    He also wrote:
    "Their reason for existence is to regulate pollutants (and it doesn’t matter if Nature produces far more of a “pollutant” than people produce)."
    Another extremely, obviously vapid argument. Yes, Nature emits more CO2 than do humans. But Nature absorbs that amount of CO2 and even more, which is why only half (about) of anthropogenic emissions reside in the atmosphere.
     
    Roy certainly knows this. So why pretend otherwise, to make such scientifically trashy arguments? Does he ever wonder why no real scientists take him seriously, and haven't for...decades? 

    Maybe he give up on being a valuable scientist long ago, and is only looking for money for his opinions from conservative, denier think tanks in DC?
     
    It's very sad to see a senior scientist making such shitty arguments, thinking they do any good whatsoever. They only ruin whatever respectability he had, which was very low to begin with. 

    Thursday, March 06, 2025

    How You Like Them Odds

    Musk said he believed A.I. would be smarter than any individual human in the next year or two, and predicted that A.I. would be smarter than all humans combined by 2029 or 2030. He said he thought there was an 80 percent chance that A.I. would have a “good outcome,” and that there was a 20 percent chance of “annihilation.”

    - Elon Musk, interview with Joe Rogan, covered by the New York Times March 3, 2025. (free link)

    Thursday, February 27, 2025

    Mass Firings at NOAA

    If no one is researching climate, climate change doesn't exist.

    Notifications of mass firings of NOAA employees were sent out Thursday afternoon, to mostly "probationary employees," recent new hires. 800 firings out of 13,000 employees (6%). New York Times (free link):

    As is the case at other agencies, the Trump administration appears to be firing probationary employees at NOAA not because their work is necessarily less valuable than that of other staff members, but because they’re easier to dismiss.

    More cuts are coming. This isn't about cutting the federal budget deficit or debt as federal employee salaries and benefits are only 3% of the federal budget. It gets even more ridiculous:

    The General Services Administration, which manages government facilities, has begun canceling some of the contracts for buildings that NOAA uses, according to a person familiar with the matter. The agency has frozen credit cards used to pay for travel and sharply restricted the amount of money employees are able to put on those cards for other purchases.

    The cuts are purely political:

    NOAA has been singled out for especially deep cuts by members of the Trump administration. Project 2025, the policy blueprint published by the Heritage Foundation that is reflected in many of the actions taken by the Trump administration so far, calls the agency “one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry.” The document urges that NOAA be dismantled and some of its programs be terminated.

    Every billion saved is another billion for billionaires.... I can't tell if Trump is trying to destroy America or if he thinks he's saving it (and for whom). He's not much of a thinker, but the people around him know what they're doing. Disgusting.