Friday, December 09, 2022

Blatant Error by AI

On the other hand, here ChatGPT makes an egregious arithmetic error. Surprising. And scary. Makes it impossible to believe any nonobvious conclusion it comes up with....


 

15 comments:

Layzej said...

Layzej: what impacts should we expect if climate sensitivity is towards the high end of estimates? How about if it's on the low end?

OpenAI: Climate sensitivity refers to the amount of warming that can be expected in response to a given increase in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. If climate sensitivity is towards the high end of estimates, we can expect more significant warming and a greater range of potential impacts on the climate and on human and natural systems. These impacts could include more frequent and intense heatwaves, changes in precipitation patterns, sea level rise, and increased risk of extreme weather events such as hurricanes and floods.

If climate sensitivity is on the low end of estimates, we can expect less warming and fewer impacts on the climate and on human and natural systems. However, it is important to note that even a small increase in global temperatures can have significant impacts, and that reducing greenhouse gas emissions is still necessary to avoid dangerous levels of warming.

Layzej said...

Not a terribly satisfying answer, but maybe as good as they come.

Layzej said...

Layzej: What climate change impacts should Ontario expect towards the end of this century?

OpenAI: It is difficult to predict exactly what climate change impacts Ontario will experience towards the end of this century, as the precise details of future climate change will depend on a number of factors, including the trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions and the resulting changes in the Earth's climate system. However, some potential impacts that Ontario may experience include increased temperatures, changes in precipitation patterns, sea level rise, and increased risk of extreme weather events such as floods and heatwaves. These changes could have significant impacts on human health, agriculture, infrastructure, and natural ecosystems in Ontario. To prepare for and mitigate these potential impacts, it is important for Ontario to take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the changing climate.

Layzej said...

Layzej: Will an eruption on Mauna Loa affect the Keeling Curve?

OpenAI: An eruption on Mauna Loa, a volcano in Hawaii, would not directly affect the Keeling Curve. The Keeling Curve is a graph that shows the concentration of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere over time, as measured at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii. The Keeling Curve is named after the scientist who began collecting this data, Charles David Keeling.

An eruption on Mauna Loa could potentially release large amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, which could contribute to global warming and climate change. However, the direct effects of an eruption on Mauna Loa would not be reflected in the Keeling Curve, which only shows the long-term trend in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations.



Layzej said...

Not bad. How about something a little more esoteric?

Layzej: who is the father of modern Hermeticism?

OpenAI: It is difficult to identify a single "father" of modern Hermeticism, as the movement has evolved over time and has been influenced by many different thinkers and philosophers. Hermeticism is a philosophical and religious tradition that is based on the teachings of Hermes Trismegistus, a figure from ancient Greek and Egyptian mythology who was believed to be the embodiment of the divine wisdom of the universe.

However, some scholars have suggested that the philosopher and mystic Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) was an important figure in the development of modern Hermeticism. Bruno was a proponent of Hermetic philosophy and wrote extensively on the subject, drawing on a wide range of sources from ancient Greek and Egyptian mythology to Renaissance occultism. He is considered by some to be the first modern Hermetic philosopher, and his work helped to lay the foundations for the revival of interest in Hermeticism in the centuries that followed.

Layzej said...

Ok, it knows its shit when it comes to Hermes, but I wouldn't trust it with medical advice (hold on, looking for some dental floss - for a friend):

Layzej: How do I get my finger back out of my ear?

OpenAI: If you have accidentally stuck your finger in your ear and are unable to get it out, the best thing to do is to try to remain calm and avoid panicking. Here are some steps you can try to help get your finger out of your ear:

Gently try to wiggle your finger back and forth to loosen it from your ear.

Pull your earlobe downwards and away from your head to help widen the opening of your ear canal.

Tilt your head to the side to help your finger slide out of your ear.

If the above steps do not work, try using a piece of dental floss or a piece of string to gently and carefully hook around your finger and pull it out of your ear.

If you are still unable to get your finger out of your ear, you may need to seek medical attention to have it removed. A doctor or nurse will be able to safely and effectively remove your finger from your ear using specialized tools and equipment.

Layzej said...

Here's a question where it will have been trained on both scholarly and dogmatic views. The answer seems to lean towards the dogmatism, even where it acknowledges the difficulties with that position. The epistle of James teaches a VERY Pauline view of Christianity, and almost certainly wasn't written by James the Just, or anyone associated with him. These two were at loggerheads.

Who wrote the epistle of James?

The Epistle of James is a book of the New Testament of the Bible, and it is traditionally attributed to James, the brother of Jesus. According to the Bible, James was a leader of the early Christian church in Jerusalem and was known for his wisdom and teachings on faith and morality. It is believed that he wrote the Epistle of James as a letter to the early Christian community, addressing a variety of topics including the nature of faith, the dangers of wealth and pride, and the importance of treating others with compassion and mercy. The Epistle of James is one of the earliest writings of the New Testament, and its message continues to be relevant and influential to Christians today.




Was the epistle of james written after james, brother of jesus, was martyred?

It is not clear exactly when the Epistle of James was written or whether it was written before or after the death of James, the brother of Jesus. The traditional view is that James wrote the Epistle of James as a letter to the early Christian community, and that it was written sometime between the mid-1st century and the early 2nd century. However, some scholars have questioned the authorship of the epistle, and it is possible that it was written by someone else who was associated with James or who was influenced by his teachings.

As for the death of James, the brother of Jesus, it is generally believed that he was martyred in Jerusalem around 62 CE. According to tradition, he was stoned to death by Jewish authorities for his role as a leader of the Christian community in Jerusalem. It is not known for certain whether the Epistle of James was written before or after his death.

Layzej said...

My big worry with AI is that it will seem to be providing insights, but will really only be parroting what is popularly understood. There are many more fundamentalist Christians than there are scholars of Christianity, so OpenAI will give you a fundamentalist answer.

AI will only help us confirm our biases.

David Appell said...

Very interesting, thanks. I'm impressed with its answer about Mauna Loa.

That's an interesting fear. I wonder if AI can somehow put a value on what it gleans from the Internet by checking it against, say, Wikipedia or other scholarly work.

I don't have access to ChatGPT yet. What if you ask it something about climate denial? "Isn't it true that climate models have a terrible record of predicting the future?"

Layzej said...

Score one for AI, I think:

Layzej: Isn't it true that climate models have a terrible record of predicting the future?


AI:

Climate models are tools that scientists use to understand and predict the Earth's climate. Like any tool, climate models have their limitations, but they have also been very successful in helping scientists understand the Earth's climate and make projections about future climate change.

It's important to note that climate models are not perfect and they are not intended to provide precise predictions of future climate conditions. Instead, they are used to simulate the complex processes that control the Earth's climate and to make projections about future climate conditions based on various scenarios. These projections are not certainties, but they can provide valuable insights into the possible outcomes of different greenhouse gas emission scenarios and help inform decision-making.

In general, climate models have been successful in reproducing many observed features of the Earth's climate, including global and regional temperature patterns, precipitation patterns, and the circulation of the atmosphere and oceans. However, like any scientific model, climate models are constantly being refined and improved as new data and observations become available.

Layzej said...

Other leading questions:

How much to adjustments to weather station data affect the perceived trend?

Adjustments to weather station data can affect the perceived trend in temperature data, but it is important to note that these adjustments are typically made to correct for known biases or errors in the data, rather than to alter the overall trend.

One common type of adjustment that is made to weather station data is known as "homogenization." This process is used to correct for changes in the location or surroundings of a weather station that could affect the temperature measurements, such as the construction of a new building near the station or a change in the type of instrument used to measure temperature. Homogenization helps to ensure that the temperature data from a weather station is consistent over time, so that it can be used to identify long-term trends.

It's also worth noting that temperature data from weather stations is just one of many sources of data that are used to understand and track global temperature trends. Other sources of data include satellite measurements, weather balloons, and ocean buoys, which can provide additional context and help to validate the temperature trends identified by weather station data.

Overall, while adjustments to weather station data can affect the perceived trend in temperature data, they are generally made to improve the accuracy and consistency of the data, rather than to alter the overall trend.

Layzej said...

The Rabett may disagree...

Why is the amazon considered the lungs of the earth?

The Amazon rainforest is often referred to as the "lungs of the earth" because it is an important source of oxygen for the planet and plays a vital role in regulating the Earth's climate.

The Amazon rainforest is home to an estimated 390 billion individual trees, representing more than 16,000 species, as well as millions of other plant and animal species. These plants, through the process of photosynthesis, absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen as a byproduct. This process helps to mitigate the greenhouse effect and regulate the Earth's climate.

In addition to producing oxygen, the Amazon rainforest also plays a key role in the global water cycle, releasing water vapor into the atmosphere through the process of transpiration, which can influence weather patterns around the world. The Amazon rainforest is also a vital resource for indigenous communities and a major contributor to the global economy through the production of timber, rubber, and other products.

Overall, the Amazon rainforest is an ecologically important region that plays a vital role in the health of the planet and the well-being of its inhabitants.


But when asked directly, AI comes through:

Will burning the Amazon rainforest deplete oxygen in the atmosphere?

The Amazon rainforest plays a vital role in producing oxygen for the planet, but burning the rainforest would not significantly deplete the oxygen in the atmosphere.

The Amazon rainforest is home to an estimated 390 billion individual trees, representing more than 16,000 species, as well as millions of other plant and animal species. These plants, through the process of photosynthesis, absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen as a byproduct. This process helps to mitigate the greenhouse effect and regulate the Earth's climate.

While fires in the Amazon rainforest can release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which can contribute to climate change, they do not significantly deplete the oxygen in the atmosphere. The oxygen content of the atmosphere is well regulated by the Earth's ecosystems, including the oceans and forests, and is not significantly affected by the burning of a single ecosystem such as the Amazon rainforest.

However, it is important to note that the destruction of the Amazon rainforest could have significant negative impacts on the Earth's climate and the well-being of the many plant and animal species that depend on the rainforest for their habitat. It could also have negative impacts on the many indigenous communities that depend on the rainforest for their livelihoods.

David Appell said...

WOW.

Those are very impressive answers. I don't see any errors in them. The writing is right on target, with the right nuances. I could not do better. Yikes.

David Appell said...

Thanks, L.

Layzej said...

Yeah, look out. My wife is in marketing and says she has 5 years before the machines come for her job.