Is it really fair to be accusing people of faking the HI memo without strong evidence? I don't think so, but that's started -- the target is Peter Gleick:
RogerPielkeJr: @mtobis @PeterGleick What fuel? I emailed him to ask, seemed like the best course of action, no? Still awaiting his reply.
Original Tweet: http://twitter.com/RogerPielkeJr/statuses/170564031998992385
This seems based on nothing except that he's in the Pacific time zone, and vague comparisons about what's written and about writing style.
By the way, my position going forward is that I'm going to assume this memo is fake until proven otherwise. It's just too fishy.