As a former conservative activist and journalist, it has been so frustrating to see my former compatriots spreading wild and unchecked claims about "voter fraud." @jacknicas of the NYT took a deep look at claims of "dead" people in Michigan voting. Link in next tweet.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
While examining claims made by right-wing activists who are not credible individuals is a thankless task which elite media editors despise, this is vital and important work in this age of fake news. Here's the link: https://t.co/WljvhMZnK6
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
As the co-creator of NewsBusters, the most prominent anti-media website, I was part of a decades-long tradition of complaining about media elites being "unfair" to conservative views. There is still much to that argument, but eventually I saw that I was missing context.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
What I did not realize until I began expanding my work into creating actual media and reporting institutions such as the Washington Examiner (I was the founding online editor) was that U.S. conservatives do not understand the purpose of journalism.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
What I did not realize until I began expanding my work into creating actual media and reporting institutions such as the Washington Examiner (I was the founding online editor) was that U.S. conservatives do not understand the purpose of journalism.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
This became evident to me as I saw that conservative-dominated media outlets were MUCH more biased than outlets run by liberals. The latter had flaws that arose from a lack of diversities (note plural) but they operated mostly in good faith. That's not how the former operated.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
I eventually realized that most people who run right-dominated media outlets see it as their DUTY to be unfair and to favor Republicans because doing so would some how counteract perceived liberal bias.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
While I was enmeshed in the conservative media tradition, I viewed lefty media thinkers like @jayrosen_nyu as arguing that journalism was supposed to be liberally biased. I was wrong. I realized later that I didn't understand that journalism is supposed to portray reality.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
This thought was phrased memorably by @StephenAtHome as "reality has a well-known liberal bias" which is an oversimplification but is more accurate than the conservative journalist view which is that media should promote and serve conservative politicians.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
I also discovered as I rose through the right-wing media ranks that most conservative media figures have no journalism training or desire to fact-check their own side. I also saw so many ppl think that reporting of info negative to GOP pols was biased, even if it was true.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
People ask sometimes if conservative media figures like Sean Hannity or anyone associated with the Federalist could actually be so credulous as to believe unfounded and non-specific allegations of "voter fraud." But the reality is that they don't actually even think that far.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
Truth for conservative journalists is anything that harms "the left." It doesn't even have to be a fact. Trump's numerous lies about any subject under the sun are thus justified because his deceptions point to a larger truth: that liberals are evil.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
This assumption is behind all conservative media output. They never tell you what their actual motives are. Most center-left people don't realize just how radical many conservative elites are, largely because they don't wear it on their sleeves.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
Newt Gingrich, William Bennett, and a bevvy of GOP elected officials have no problem parroting unverified rumors as fact because conservative journalism is not about supporting conservatives, not about finding facts.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
Thanks for reading my rant.
— Matthew Sheffield (@mattsheffield) November 7, 2020
If you would to see some of my writing that explores this topic at greater length, here is an older piece I wrote about the vulnerability of "own the libs" conservatism to reaction. https://t.co/zhG2ZBI81T
Note 12/27: A few minor edits at the beginning.
10 comments:
Twitter is destroying rational disussion. No matter if you agree with what he says or not, reading it formatted like that is a PITA.
It's OK if you read it on Twitter -- the repetition don't show up. It just shows up like that on the embeddings, like here. It might be easier to just start at this first tweet and read it there:
https://twitter.com/mattsheffield/status/1324908316548493313
I'll put a link near the top of my post to say that.
I put a note in the first paragraph that it's cleaner to read the tweets on twitter.com. Hope that helps.
An incorrect syllogism:
{Some claims of fraud failed to stand up}
THEREFORE
[All claims fraud will fail to stand up}
Cheers
Still no evidence.
David in Cal
No human system is completely immune to fraud, though we can get pretty close.
In Northern Ireland the dead used to arise and vote, and we were encouraged to vote early and often. There was stiff competition to be the party controlling the electoral commission because of the opportunities for voter suppression and gerrymandering.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_suppression_in_the_United_States
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering
We have learned the hard way how to run a voting system.You have to pass multiple identity checks to join the electoral register and cast your vote. The electoral register, constituency boundaries, the number and positioning of polling stations etc are controlled by an Electoral Commission structured to minimise political control.The
Having now watched two US elections from the outside, it is noticeable that the actual voting system is resistant to personation or multiple voting fraud and the counting systems are similarly robust.The
The weakness is in the Electoral Commissions. These are under the political control of whichever party controls the state.
This makes it too easy to rig the system to maximise the votes and candidates for your own side while minimising those of your opposition.
David in Cal
If you want to improve the system, remove the opportunities for gerrymandering and voter suppression by removing the opportunities for voter suppression and gerrymandering.
Remove partisan political control of the Electoral Commissions.
Sorry, that got a bit scrambled by my software.
David in Cal
If you want to improve the system, remove the opportunities for gerrymandering and voter suppression.
Remove partisan political control of the Electoral Commissions. "
Still no evidence.
In fairness he did tell us about the "suitcases" of votes "hidden" under a desk. I wonder what happened to them?
Here's proof of voter fraud. This is one of the 10 dead voters highlighted by Trump's legal team: "A Pennsylvania man is facing charges of unlawful voting and perjury after prosecutors say he illegally voted on behalf of a long-dead family member in the General Election." - https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/america-votes/pennsylvania-man-accused-of-casting-dead-mother-s-ballot-for-trump-1.5241670
How many more dead mothers voted for Trump?
The world is beginning to understand that elections in the USA are a sham.
Post a Comment