Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Tit for Tat?

UPDATE 2/16 3:44 pm - This post is partly based on information from a document the Heartland Institute says is fake.
--

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/feb/15/leak-exposes-heartland-institute-climate

Anthony Watt$ say$ he needed $90,000...to make $ome graph$.
"for funding a special project having to do with presenting some new NOAA surface data in a public friendly graphical form, something NOAA themselves is not doing, but should be. I approached them in the fall of 2011 asking for help, on this project not the other way around."
Sure he did. $ure.

Update: Watt$ $ay$ only $44K ha$ been pledged $o far. Apparently time$ are tight even for denier$.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Out of curiosity, what is your point here? Projects cost money, even "skeptical" ones?